Director's cut of the movie:
(Rachael leaves the room)
Deckard: "She's a Replicant, isn't she?"
Tyrell: "I'm impressed. How many questions does it usually take to spot one?"
Deckard: "I don't get it, Tyrell."
Tyrell: "How many questions?"
Deckard: "Twenty, thirty, cross-referenced."
Tyrell: "It took more than a hundred for Rachael, didn't it?"
Deckard: "She doesn't know?"
Tyrell: "She's beginning to suspect, I think."
Deckard: "Suspect! How can it not know what it is?"
So do all nexus-6 replicants start life thinking they are human? How did Roy and Co find out they weren't human? Wouldn't it be a huge risk to let a replicant believe they were human? If it is known they are emotionally unstable, wouldn't it be better to condition them to accept their replicant status rather than them find out by accident?
Tyrell: "Commerce is our goal here at Tyrell. 'More human than human' is our motto."
Tyrell: "Rachael is an experiment. Nothing more."
Are all nexus-6 reps 'experiments' then? If not, what makes Rachael different?
Tyrell: "We began to recognize in them a strange obsession."
Who? nexus-5 reps? nexus-6 reps?
Tyrell: "After all, they are emotionally inexperienced with only a few years in which to store up the experiences which you and I take for granted."
Is Tyrell talking about the nexus-6, with a 4-year life-span?
Tyrell: "If we gift them with a past, we create a cushion or a pillow for their emotions and consequently we can control them better."
Is this what the 'Rachael' experiment shows?
Deckard: "Memories. You're talking about memories!"
Yes, we know Rachael has implanted memories because Deckard read them in her file - why didn't he know about the other replicants 'implanted' memories? In the voice-over version of the movie, why did Deckard assume Leon was like Rachael? Couldn't he just check Leon's file like he did Rachaels and see for himself?
For me this entire discussion revolves around the question: What is 'experimental' about Rachael?
The impression that I get from the conversation between Deckard and Tyrell is that Rachael is nexus-6
PLUS - the extra feature being 'implanted memories'. Therefore, your run-of-the-mill nexus-6 replicants such as Roy and Leon may have developed a desire to hold onto their memories, but DO NOT have an implanted past like Rachael.
I think we can say that at some point implanted memories are featured in the development of replicants. But I think Tyrell is expressing an intention for future replicants not the current - therefore, I don't think you can categorically say that Roy and the other nexus-6 replicants (excepting Rachael) definitely had implanted memories.
Another marvellous piece of Blade Runner ambiguity - it's either very clever or just lazy.
BTW, I know many of you think we over-do the analysis on Blade Runner and I'm as guilty as anyone for doing so - but I think it's because there are so many holes left undefined that the temptation is just too great not to fill them.
If Blade Runner had taken off in the same way as Star Wars or Star Trek then the writers would have gone back and filled in the gaps for us. But the reality is that they did just enough to get the film to the screen and unfortunately that leaves a very sketchy 'universe' for us to play in. I think that if we want more of the same, then we
should speculate about the 'blanks' and perhaps in doing so, provide a more rounded 'unverse' to build future stories from.