Page 1 of 1

PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2002 3:05 pm
by Guest
does anyone think that they should twist the story of bladerunner to suit all peoples views and do you think they should go into more depth with racheals(sean young)and ricks(harrison ford) romance more? <IMG SRC="/forum/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif">

PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2002 10:30 pm
by BR796164
The romance in BR is very decent, appropriate to the main plotline and intentions of the director. So I suppose that pushing the story more in this way would disable or destroy other impotant aspects. <BR> <BR>The romance between Deckard and Rachael/Sarah Tyrell was developed further in Jeter's novels and it really sucked. <BR>In some places of the books I had the feeling like if I was reading one of the Harlequin issues or something. <BR> <BR> <BR>interesting nick btw <IMG SRC="/forum/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif"> <BR>_________________ <BR> <BR><!-- BBCode u2 Start --><A HREF="" TARGET="_blank"><!-- BBCode Start --><IMG SRC="" BORDER="0"><!-- BBCode End --></A><!-- BBCode u2 End --><BR><BR><font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: BR796164 on 2002-10-22 04:33 ]</font>

PostPosted: Fri Oct 25, 2002 10:55 am
I felt they left it as much up to the audience to make up their own mind with the DC

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2003 8:22 pm
by DeckLA2019a
i was reading a review, not that i need to review it or anything, and something stuck out. You know when Bryant was talking to Deckard, and Deckard didnt know about the 4 year life span, wouldnt he know about the 4 year life span? Evidence that Deckard is a replicant, i didnt see any posts about this, but i feel it makes sence