Page 1 of 1

Posted:
Mon Dec 23, 2002 6:53 pm
by BR12819
My friends it is a fact there is a Blade Runner sequel and unfortunatly it is unworthy of its title its called Blade Runner 2: Replicants Within. If you must watch it you can see it at ifilm but be forwarned it is BAD, VERY BAD its a true blasphmey to Blade Runner jus thought i'd let you know
[addsig]

Posted:
Tue Dec 24, 2002 4:19 am
by Centauro
Well, please ask them who directed and produced it. I doubt it is an official sequel (which I don't want to be made ever), because the copyright holders of Blade Runner are very jealous about it (excepting that Jetter stupid novels). Guess that someone made it... someone who can write his/her fanfic and then film it. I'd like to have those resources, hmmm...
<BR>
<BR>[Googles it...]
<BR>
<BR>I found this article in the website of our friend netrunner (AKA BRMovie):
<BR>
<BR><!-- BBCode u1 Start --><A HREF="http://www.brmovie.com/Articles/BR2_The_Replicants_Within.htm" TARGET="_blank">http://www.brmovie.com/Articles/BR2_The_Replicants_Within.htm</A><!-- BBCode u1 End -->
[addsig]

Posted:
Tue Dec 24, 2002 7:47 am
by BR12819
True the movies title is called BR2: Replicants within butit is what it is you
<BR>can find out more about the dierector Harris Pozderac at his offical website <!-- BBCode auto-link start --><a href="http://www.unitedvillains.com/" target="_blank">http://www.unitedvillains.com/</a><!-- BBCode auto-link end --> which is somewhat interesting
[addsig]

Posted:
Thu Dec 26, 2002 10:24 am
by ROBOCOP
It's probably just a fanfilm!
[addsig]

Posted:
Thu Dec 26, 2002 9:32 pm
by BR796164
Yep, just an amateur funpiece. Nothing to scream about. Any child can make a short sequel to his favourite flick these days.
<BR>
<BR>Would like to see it though.
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>

Posted:
Fri Dec 27, 2002 6:39 am
by BR12819
just a heads up you better have something better than a 56k connection i watched it with one and well lets just say it was interesting <IMG SRC="/forum/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif"> the link to watch it is in my first post i think
[addsig]

Posted:
Fri Dec 27, 2002 6:39 am
by BR12819
just a heads up you better have something better than a 56k connection i watched it with one and well lets just say it was interesting <IMG SRC="/forum/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif"> the link to watch it is in my first post i think
[addsig]

Posted:
Fri Dec 27, 2002 3:25 pm
by endzem
Amen to that! I have regular dial up and it took a long while to download. Then, after about 10 seconds of play, it would stall for another 10 seconds. Very frustrating. After about a minute, I determined it wasn?t worth it. The short "movie" seemed like crap anyway.
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>

Posted:
Mon Dec 30, 2002 5:09 am
by BRmovie
I reviewed this film several months ago. Read <!-- BBCode u2 Start --><A HREF="http://www.brmovie.com/Articles/BR2_The_Replicants_Within.htm" TARGET="_blank">my review</A><!-- BBCode u2 End --> if you like.
<BR>
<BR>I don't think the film is crap and indeed when it was put for some serious awards, it appears not everyone else does either! However, it is definitely to be viewed in the spirit of a fan fiction rather than trying to be a commercial sequel. What I would say is that it took me a few viewings to get some of the ideas in it. (Although I should say, that this was made easier by virtue of the director having sent me a videocassette before he'd put it on iFilm.)
<BR>
<BR>Actually, I don't think it is very easy to watch any sort of movies with a 56k connection. At one time I had that and I often gave up trying.
<BR>
<BR>Anyway the film is worth trying. It has some significant flaws, but it is a serious effort at a proper short film and shouldn't be dismissed out of hand.
<BR>
[addsig]

Posted:
Mon Dec 30, 2002 4:52 pm
by BR12819
I wish to retract my first post it was posted during one of my weaker moments anyways i watched it again and talked via email to the director and have found a new respect for the film. I myself whish to one day become a professional film maker and with a couple short films under my belt truly realize the difficulties in making a film so while i wont recogmize it for a Blade Runner sequel i will recognize it as a terrific fan film
[addsig]

Posted:
Mon Dec 30, 2002 11:35 pm
by BRmovie
It just occurred to me, I should mention that this isn't the first attempt at a "Blade Runner sequel". There is a film called "I.K.U." which starts at the point where Deckard and Rachael get into the elevator. But from the first moments. it rockets off at a completely different tangent ... all to do with sex. Lots of sex. Of all types. For more, check out the <!-- BBCode u2 Start --><A HREF="http://us.imdb.com/Title?0255233" TARGET="_blank">IMDb listing</A><!-- BBCode u2 End -->.
[addsig]

Posted:
Thu Jan 02, 2003 8:28 pm
by BR796164
Oh my God of biomechanics!

Posted:
Fri Jan 03, 2003 2:28 am
by Patryk Wawer
The movie is good, the title is wrong.
<BR>It doesn't deserve to be called "a Sequel"
<BR>
<BR>I only liked the creditcard machine build in the "hooker reps"