My vote is No.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:20 am
Even if Ridley Scott made the prequel or sequel, it would not be as unique as the first.
For myself, part of what makes Blade Runner so fascinating is its mysterious quality. The enjoyment is not in the details but the lack of. I don't see how another Blade Runner film could keep that quality. Naturally a sequel or even a prequel would want to present a greater scope on the Blade Runner world. If we learned more about the Off World colonies, would Deckard's Los Angeles be as tragic? There is a domino effect of story elements like that, that if explained would lessen the impact of the first film.
For myself, part of what makes Blade Runner so fascinating is its mysterious quality. The enjoyment is not in the details but the lack of. I don't see how another Blade Runner film could keep that quality. Naturally a sequel or even a prequel would want to present a greater scope on the Blade Runner world. If we learned more about the Off World colonies, would Deckard's Los Angeles be as tragic? There is a domino effect of story elements like that, that if explained would lessen the impact of the first film.