Deckard's handgun
Moderator: Wilkins Rep-Detect BR2349
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
I read on here a while ago an essay written on Leon's blackhole firearm. Now judging by the scene where he shoots Holden and the scene where Deckard fires his own firearm, it makes me think they're one in the same. Is Deckard also using the same blackhole weapon as Leon or is it just a suped up pistol, standard for BR's? Any opinions?
Technology Loves Misery.
there was an interesting article on the RAC Props site heres the link <!-- BBCode u1 Start --><A HREF="http://www.racprops.com/issue4/brblaster/" TARGET="_blank">http://www.racprops.com/issue4/brblaster/</A><!-- BBCode u1 End --> in it they discuss the caliber and ammo used in deckards gun rather interesting might be able to use some of it for the tech page THX1138 check it out
[addsig]
[addsig]
Holden:"It's a wipe out, they're almost us!"
Nice article... but we all can only assume.<BR><BR>I guess that the most powerful current handguns (Ruger Redhawk or Casul f.e.) would be nothing in comparison with P/K-D.<BR><BR>The idea with caseless expansive rounds is interesting, that would explain the big BOOOM everytime the blaster shoots. <BR>But also, it can be capable of firing various types of rounds. <BR><BR>_________________<BR>"We need ya, Deck!" <!-- BBCode u2 Start --><A HREF="http://forum.br-insight.com/" TARGET="_blank">Blade Runner Insight Forum</A><!-- BBCode u2 End --><BR><BR><font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: BR796164 on 2003-02-24 09:00 ]</font>
I assume that Deckard's blaster would be more powerful than Redhawks/SuperRedhawks and Casulls too. However, considering that he doesn't suffer much from obvious recoil when firing the gun, I wonder if there isn't some sort of internal recoil-absorbing mechanism. I can fire a .44 Magnum without an observer noticing too much recoil, but the .454 Casull is a different matter entirely. Thus, considering that Deckard seemingly fires the blaster without much evidence of recoil, I figure that the gun has some sort of mechanism which compensates for the recoil.
I would say that, even if Deckard is a replicant, he's no stronger physically than an average human. Look at the way Leon, Pris, and Zhora manhandled him. If he were in their league physically, don't you think he could have avoided being assaulted so severely? The only thing that saved him in his encounters with the Nexus-6 replicants was luck.<BR><BR>And, if he is a replicant, he is an example of a shoddy product, in my opinion. He has, at best, average physical strength and intelligence and the only thing seemingly going for him is that he has decent tracking skills and he's a good shot.<BR><BR><font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: IntelliDroid on 2003-02-25 08:05 ]</font>
BR796164, you get my pm?<BR><BR>the simple fact that there is no need for a shell casing or gunpowder means the projetile itself could be of a rather large bore. <BR>I own a Ruger .480 Super Redhawk, the thing is a cannon and difficult to be accurate with out past about 20 yards.<BR><BR>On the other hand, i have fired a Desert Eagle .50AE and it has about half the kick as the ruger, because of its built in recoil supression.<BR><BR>Taking into account the obvious implied technological advances in weaponry, i would say the PKD is a large bore weapon with a strong recoil supression system.
[addsig]
[addsig]
Gaff: "You've done a man's job, sir! I guess you are through?"
Deckard: "Finished".
The first thing I thought was a high tech revovler, I don't think it would fire a big round though alot of PDW's that are coming out don't and they are extremely effective, I'd say it had some type of armor peircing round in it(making it caseless explains the lack of brass being ejected out when Deckard shoots his gun) .
As for the loud explosion I would say that .22's do tend to have a pretty big bark,especially if being fired from a revovler.
Or that the people who made the movie just wanted a high tech gun and used some type of pyrotechnic to make it look like it was shooting (like the machine gun on goblins glider in Spider-Man)
As for the loud explosion I would say that .22's do tend to have a pretty big bark,especially if being fired from a revovler.
Or that the people who made the movie just wanted a high tech gun and used some type of pyrotechnic to make it look like it was shooting (like the machine gun on goblins glider in Spider-Man)
"a witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire
"Nothing in the world is more distasteful to a man then to take the path that leads to himself"--Herman Hesse
"Nothing in the world is more distasteful to a man then to take the path that leads to himself"--Herman Hesse
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Blade Runner Round Table
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

